From 1910
down through 1914, in addition to the semi-automatic attachments, rifles of Springfield
Armory design, and the Schouboe, tests were made of some six other models. Drawings
of others were examined but no models sent for test.50 Five
of the six models tested were discarded rather promptly, the Standard Arms Company
model, the Dreyse Automatic Carbine, the Kjellman Automatic Rifle, the Benét-Mercie,
and the Rock Island Arsenal model. Only the Bang semi-automatic received prolonged
consideration.
The Smith-Condit Self-Loading
Gas-Operated Rifle
The “Standard
Semi-automatic Sporting Rifle” was twice tested in the early month of 1910.
It may have been a further development of the “Smith-Condit Self-Loading
Gas-Operated Rifle” (see above p.8), inasmuch as W.D. Condit was Secretary
of the Standard Arms Company. The new rifle was gas-operated. The Board of Officers
examining the Standard refused to recommend it, not because of malfunctioning
of the semi-automatic mechanism, but because of the rifle’s unsuitability
as a military arm. Not only was it not designed for service ammunition, it was
labeled not strong enough to use that high pressure type. Its rapidity of fire
was less than ninety rounds per minute and the length of time needed for disassembly
and the number of tools needed for reassembly told against it. There were other
lesser faults, but probably the chief objection was the rifle’s general
lack of sturdiness.51
The same criticism
of not being strong enough to use service ammunition resulted in the rejection
of the Dreyse Carbine and the Kjellman Automatic rifle. In the case of the Dreyse,
tested on September 12, 1910, the report declared the gun neither safe nor sturdy
enough.52 The Kjellman, a recoil-operated
arm of Swedish invention, was of lesser caliber than .30, did not achieve the
desired rapidity of fire or initial velocity, and displayed various other weaknesses.
On the other hand, several advantageous features, the 9.72 pound weight, the
balance, the few tools required for dismounting, the useableness either as a
self-loader or as a repeater, the arrangement whereby the bolt had to lock before
the firing mechanism could be operated, and several others, led the Ordnance
Department to instruct the Armory to repair the damage done the rifle during
the second part of Test XI, (See Appendix II) and then ship the arm to Rock Island
Arsenal.53 Rock Island was to
undertake further firing tests.
In October
1913 the Rock Island Arsenal itself submitted for test at Springfield a semi-automatic
designed and manufactured at the western arsenal. After only two shots had been
fires, however, the bolt broke. As the mechanism failed to meet the requirement
of simplicity, strength, and compactness, the Commanding Officer of the Armory,
recommended that no new bolt be fabricated or further firing tests be conducted.54
A few weeks
before the unqualified disapproval of the Rock Island design, the Benét-Mercíe
automatic shoulder rifle was tried out. This was basically a modification of
the Benét-Mercíe automatic machine rifle, the U.S. M1909, lightened
and adapted to use as a shoulder arm. The report of the Board of Officers in
Springfield announced the rifle to be ingenious of design but too complicated
and expensive. Comprising 211 parts, the semi-automatic would be too costly to
manufacture for service use.55
e.g. S.A. 109/h, O.O. 34384-65,
2nd Ind., Incl 1, June 21, 1909; 109/j, O.O., 38351-237, 2nd Ind., May 21, 1910;
109/m, O.O. 38351-628, July 21, 1913; 109/m, 38351-645, Incl 1, October 22, 1913;
S.A. 110-2, O.O. 38351-731, March 6, 1914.
S.A. 109/I, O.O. 38351-213,
April 8, 1910; S.A. 109/h, O.O. 38351-232, 2nd Ind., Incl 1, June 16, 1910
S.A. 109/h, O.O. 38351-239,
2nd Ind., Sept. 12, 1910
S.A. 109/I, O.O. 38351-265,
2nd Ind., Nov. 9, 1910, O.O. 38351-272, 4th Ind., Dec. 16, 1910
S.A. 109/m, O.O. 38351-531,
Oct. 29, 1st Ind., Oct. 30, 1913
S.A. 109/m, O.O. 39153-931,
1st Ind., Oct. 7, 1913
|